Spend time in NYC and sooner or later you will meet or see someone famous. And although I once saw President Clinton, I have never met any mayor of NYC. Until yesterday when I met the Mayor of Strawberry Fields.
Strawberry Fields is the Central Park memorial to John Lennon. Located steps from his apartment in the Dakota, the memorial is just inside the W 72nd St entrance to the park.
Currently, I'm working on a series of paintings of Central Park and, when time allows, I spend a few hours in the park sketching and photographing. Or, as my good friend Karrie jokingly puts it, stalking. That's how I met Gary De Santos, the self proclaimed (and not readily disputed) Mayor of Strawberry Fields.
Each morning for the past sixteen years, and for the foreseeable future, Gary lovingly decorates the Imagine mosaic with fresh flowers, mementos and seasonal flora. Each display is unique and eye catching. While chatting me up Gary told me that he was famous: articles about him have appeared in the New York Times, Rolling Stone and a long list of other A list publications; a movie had been made about him; he knew Yoko and other celebrities personally etc.. I thought, um, ok. But part of me thought ...Hey, its NY. You never know. "Look for me on The YouTube and The Google" he yelled after me.
Everything Gary told me appears to be true. Here's a recent New York Times article about him.
The Mayor of Strawberry Fields, however, is not without controversy. Some see him as an artist, some as a nuisance panhandler, some as a parasite on John Lennon's hard earned reputation. Gary sees himself as lover and spreader of peace and love.
Beyond the legal ramifications of his work which are beyond my scope and knowledge, he does raise some intriguing questions for both the general public and the art world. Specifically:
- Does Gary have a right to create art in a public space that was designed for the use of all not just one? Does his art and presence, complete with donation bowl, impede the right of others to enjoy the space? Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once said, "The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins." It can be difficult to locate the anatomy though where art is concerned . Would it matter if he weren't asking for donations via his "Make A Wish" sign and donation bowl? Is this where the public's nose begins?
- Is there a higher artistic virtue in the mix? Many now beloved public art spaces and memorials were, at their birth, controversial. In the 19th century, the newly proposed Central Park was decried as a potential haven for criminals and scoundrels. The Washington Monument was mired in controversy for 40 years before it was opened in 1888. More recently, Maya Lin's Vietnam Veterans Memorial, opened to the public in 1982, incited red hot tempers. Because Gary DeSantos' work is not approved by any commission or government agency, is it less of a memorial? Less worthy? Or, does government and peer review earn the art it's legitimacy?
Here's a solution that might work: An individual patron or arts organization could fund his work. This would would negate his need to ask for donations via the tour guide pitch or the donation bowl and allow the public to enjoy his creations unimpeded. Until then, Gary DeSantos is likely to continue to find himself in a battle despite his stand for peace.